The Effect of Lumbar Belt on the Variability of Spine and Pelvis Coordination during Repetitive Lifts in Male Athletes with Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Cross-Sectional Study

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors
Hamed Fadaei 1
Ali Abbasi 2
Sheida Shourabadi 3
Mostafa Sajedinia 1
1 Department of Biomechanics and Sports Pathology, School of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Biomechanics and Sports Pathology, School of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Kharazmi University, Karaj, Iran
3 MSc Student, Department of Biomechanics and Sports Pathology, School of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Shahid Bahonar University, Kerman, Iran
10.48305/jrrs.2023.26566.0
Abstract
Introduction: Optimizing strategies to reduce the negative effects of lifts on low back pain (LBP) have attracted the attention of researchers. One of the practical strategies to deal with the effects of loads on the spine is lumbar belts. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lumbar belts on the coordination variability of spine and pelvis during repetitive lifts in male athletes with non-specific chronic LBP.
Materials and Methods: Twelve male athletes with chronic LBP participated in the study voluntarily. Participants with and without belts lifted the box for one minute at a frequency of 10 times per minute, and cinematic information based on the three-segment model of spine was recorded using a motion capture system equipped with 10 cameras. Coordination and coordination changes for these segments were calculated using a modified vector coding (VC) method. To compare the collected data, if normal, paired t-test was used in SPSS software and in variability data, statistical parametric mapping (SPM) method was used in MATLAB software with the  significance level of P ≤ 0.05.
Results: A significant difference was observed for the coordination of the pelvic segment to the lower back segment [concentric phase (P ≤ 0.035), eccentric phase (P ≤ 0.043)]. On the other hand, no significant difference was reported between using and not using belts for the coordination of the lumbar segment to the lower trunk segment (P = 0.545), lower trunk segment to the upper trunk segment (P = 0.440), and the variability of all calculated couples
Conclusion: According to the findings, using the belt may optimize the transfer of motion from the distal segment to the proximal segment, which can reduce the pressure on the waist and prevent injury and pain in the lumbar region. Therefore, it is recommended that athletes with LBP use a belt when lifting heavy loads in order to transfer movement from the distal to the proximal segment correctly.
Keywords
Chronic non-specific low back pain
Lift
Coordination variability
Belt
Spine
  1. Twomey LT, Taylor JR. Physical therapy of the low back. Vol. 18. New York, NY: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
  2. Rohlmann A, Pohl D, Bender A, Graichen F, Dymke J, Schmidt H, et al. Activities of everyday life with high spinal loads. PLoS One 2014; 9(5): e98510.
  3. Aasa U, Svartholm I, Andersson F, Berglund L. Injuries among weightlifters and powerlifters: A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51(4): 211-9.
  4. Habibi E, Fereidan M, Molla Aghababai A, Pourabdian S. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and associated lost work days in steel making industry. Iran J Public Health 1; 37(1): 83-91.
  5. Galukande M, Muwazi S, Mugisa BD. Disability associated with low back pain in Mulago Hospital, Kampala Uganda. Afr Health Sci 2006; 6(3): 173-6.
  6. Gatchel RJ, Polatin PB, Noe C, Gardea M, Pulliam C, Thompson J. Treatment- and cost-effectiveness of early intervention for acute low-back pain patients: A one-year prospective study. J Occup Rehabil 2003; 13(1): 1-9.
  7. GBD 2015 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016; 388(10053): 1545-602.
  8. Duthey B. Background paper 6.24 low back pain. Priority medicines for Europe and the world. Global Burden of Disease; 2013. p. 1-29.
  9. Bahr R, Andersen SO, Loken S, Fossan B, Hansen T, Holme I. Low back pain among endurance athletes with and without specific back loading--a cross-sectional survey of cross-country skiers, rowers, orienteerers, and nonathletic controls. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004; 29(4): 449-54.
  10. Thornton JS, Vinther A, Wilson F, Lebrun CM, Wilkinson M, Di Ciacca SR, et al. Rowing Injuries: An updated review. Sports Med 2017; 47(4): 641-61.
  11. Antwi-Afari MF, Li H, Edwards DJ, Parn EA, Seo J, Wong AYL. Biomechanical analysis of risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders during repetitive lifting task in construction workers. Autom Constr 2017; 83: 41-7.
  12. Pranata A, Perraton L, El-Ansary D, Clark R, Mentiplay B, Fortin K, et al. Trunk and lower limb coordination during lifting in people with and without chronic low back pain. J Biomech 2018; 71: 257-63.
  13. Saraceni N, Kent P, Ng L, Campbell A, Straker L, O'Sullivan P. To flex or not to flex? Is there a relationship between lumbar spine flexion during lifting and low back pain? A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020; 50(3): 121-30.
  14. Needham R, Stebbins J, Chockalingam N. Three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbar spine during gait using marker-based systems: A systematic review. J Med Eng Technol 2016; 40(4): 172-85.
  15. Pelegrinelli ARM, Silva MF, Guenka LC, Carrasco AC, Moura FA, Cardoso JR. Low back pain affects coordination between the trunk segments but not variability during running. J Biomech 2020; 101: 109605.
  16. Alijanpour E, Abbasi A, Needham RA, Naemi R. Spine and pelvis coordination variability in rowers with and without chronic low back pain during rowing. J Biomech 2021; 120: 110356.
  17. Fadaei H. The effect of powerlifting belt on spine and pelvis coordination variability during deadlift with different loading [Research Project]. Tehran, Iran: Kharazmi University; 2020. [In Persian].
  18. Kiernan D, Malone A, O'Brien T, Simms CK. A quantitative comparison of two kinematic protocols for lumbar segment motion during gait. Gait Posture 2015; 41(2): 699-705.
  19. Leardini A, Biagi F, Merlo A, Belvedere C, Benedetti MG. Multi-segment trunk kinematics during locomotion and elementary exercises. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2011; 26(6): 562-71.
  20. Christe G, Redhead L, Legrand T, Jolles BM, Favre J. Multi-segment analysis of spinal kinematics during sit-to-stand in patients with chronic low back pain. J Biomech 2016; 49(10): 2060-7.
  21. Christe G, Kade F, Jolles BM, Favre J. Chronic low back pain patients walk with locally altered spinal kinematics. J Biomech 2017; 60: 211-8.
  22. Needham RA, Naemi R, Hamill J, Chockalingam N. Analysing patterns of coordination and patterns of control using novel data visualisation techniques in vector coding. Foot (Edinb) 2020; 44: 101678.
  23. Abbasi A, Yazdanbakhsh F, Tazji MK, Aghaie AP, Svoboda Z, Nazarpour K, et al. A comparison of coordination and its variability in lower extremity segments during treadmill and overground running at different speeds. Gait Posture 2020; 79: 139-44.
  24. Robertson G, Caldwell G, Hamill J, Kamen G, Whittlesey S. Research methods in biomechanics. 2nd Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013.
  25. Needham R, Naemi R, Chockalingam N. Quantifying lumbar-pelvis coordination during gait using a modified vector coding technique. J Biomech 2014; 47(5): 1020-6.
  26. Lariviere C, Gagnon D, Loisel P. A biomechanical comparison of lifting techniques between subjects with and without chronic low back pain during freestyle lifting and lowering tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2002; 17(2): 89-98.
  27. Nimbarte A, Aghazadeh F, Harvey C. Effect of back belt on inter-joint coordination and postural index. Occup Ergon 2005; 5(4): 219-33.
  28. Lariviere C, Caron JM, Preuss R, Mecheri H. The effect of different lumbar belt designs on the lumbopelvic rhythm in healthy subjects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014; 15: 307.
  29. Finnie SB, Wheeldon TJ, Hensrud DD, Dahm DL, Smith J. Weight lifting belt use patterns among a population of health club members. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17(3): 498-502.
  30. Hassan Zahraee M, Karimi MT, Mostamand J. Energy consumption during walking among patients with non-specific chronic low back pain, based on physiological cost index. J Res Rehabil Sci 2014; 9(5): 776-84. [In Persian].
  31. Hemming R, Sheeran L, van Deursen R, Sparkes V. Non-specific chronic low back pain: differences in spinal kinematics in subgroups during functional tasks. Eur Spine J 2018; 27(1): 163-70.
  32. Majidi A, Hiradasa R, Aghdam H, Shirzad H, Sikaroodi H, Samadi S. Assessment of disability effects of chronic low back pain in NAJA Vali-e- Asr (A) hospital patients before and after a period of medical treatment using Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. J Police Med 2012; 1(3): 150-60. [In Persian].
  33. Homs AF, Dupeyron A, Torre K. Relationship between gait complexity and pain attention in chronic low back pain. Pain 2022; 163(1): e31-e39.
  34. Boocock MG, Naude Y, Kilby J, Mawston GA. Real-time biofeedback and its ability to affect changes in spinal posture during repetitive lifting. Occup Environ Med 2018; 75(Suppl 2): A268.
  35. Waters TR, Putz-Anderson V, Garg A, Fine LJ. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics 1993; 36(7): 749-76.
  36. Hodges PW, Bui BH. A comparison of computer-based methods for the determination of onset of muscle contraction using electromyography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 101(6): 511-9.
  37. Ghiasi F, Nourbakhsh MR, Maroofi N. Analysis of lumbar spine and hip pattern motion while stoop lifting in subjects with and without a history of low back pain. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2007; 17(59): 42-50. [In Persian].
  38. Romanazzi M, Galante D, Sforza C. Intralimb joint coordination of the lower extremities in resistance training exercises. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2015; 25(1): 61-8.
  39. Sajedeinia M. Effect of loadings type on coordination variability of spine and pelvis during squat and deadlift [Research Project]. Tehran, Iran: Kharazmi University; 2021.
  40. Nussbaum MA, Chaffin DB. Development and evaluation of a scalable and deformable geometric model of the human torso. Clin Biomech 1996; 11(1): 25-34.
  41. Wrigley AT, Albert WJ, Deluzio KJ, Stevenson JM. Differentiating lifting technique between those who develop low back pain and those who do not. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005; 20(3): 254-63.
  42. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
  43. Ferber R, Pohl MB. Changes in joint coupling and variability during walking following tibialis posterior muscle fatigue. J Foot Ankle Res 2011; 4: 6.
  44. Hamill J, Palmer C, Van Emmerik RE. Coordinative variability and overuse injury. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol 2012; 4(1): 45.

Article View 47,343
PDF Download 39,963