Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Movement Assessment Battery for Children Checklist in 6- to 7-Year-Old Children

Document Type : Original Articles


1 School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, School of Physical Education and Sport Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran



Introduction: The Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC) checklist has been designed to investigate children’s movement disorders at school; however, the validation characteristics of this checklist in Iran have not been evaluated. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of MABC checklist.Materials and Methods: The participants in this study comprised 181 six-year-old children (87 girls and 94 boys) and 166 seven-year-old children (89 girls and 77 boys) from Isfahan City, Iran. Their sports teachers completed the MABC checklist. To measure concurrent validity, motor skills of 233 of these children were assessed using MABC. To measure construct validity, confirmatory factor analysis and convergent validity [Average Variance Extracted (AVE)] were used. Moreover, to measure reliability, Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability, and test-retest reliability were used.Results: AVE indicator was used to evaluate subscales of child stationary/environment stable, child moving/environment stable, child stationary/environment changing, child moving/environment changing, and behavioral problems related to motor difficulties. The overall scores obtained were 0.51, 0.5, 0.53, 0.54, 0.49, and 0.5, respectively. Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability were 0.79 and 0.84 for the subscales of “the child is stationary and the environment is stable”, 0.85 and 0.88 for “the child is moving and the environment is stable”, 0.87 and 0.84 for “the child is stationary and the environment is changing”, 0.89 and 0.91 for “the child is moving and the environment is changing”, 0.81 and 0.82 for “behaviors related to physical activity”, and 0.92 and 0.94 for all the subscales. The correlation coefficient of MABC with MABC checklist was 0.37, which was significant at P < 0.001.Conclusion: The data indicate that MABC checklist is valid and reliable for 6- to 7-year-old children. Therefore, teachers are recommended to use this checklist in investigating children’s movement disorders in primary school children.


  1. Frost J, Sutterby JA. Our proud heritage: Outdoor Play is essential to whole child development. Young Children 2017; 72(3): 82-5.
  2. Julian-Almarcegui C, Gomez-Cabello A, Huybrechts I, Gonzalez-Aguero A, Kaufman JM, Casajus JA, et al. Combined effects of interaction between physical activity and nutrition on bone health in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Nutr Rev 2015; 73(3): 127-39.
  3. Piercy KL, Troiano RP, Ballard RM, Carlson SA, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, et al. The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. JAMA 2018; 320(19): 2020-8.
  4. Haynes W, Waddington G, Adams RD. Associations among balance, physical activity, physical fitness, and academic results in schoolchildren. Health Behav Policy Rev 2018; 5(1): 57-68.
  5. Kane KJ, Staples KL. A Group Motor Skills Program for Children with Coordination Difficulties: Effect on fundamental movement skills and physical activity participation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2016; 36(1): 28-45.
  6. Anshory J, Hardinsyah H, Tanziha I, Mappaompo A, Nasrah N. The effect of physical activity (Endurance and strength) and sleep management on BMI and body fat children overweight in Makassar city. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 2018; 9(10): 417.
  7. Chan CHS, Ha ASC, Ng JYY, Lubans DR. Associations between fundamental movement skill competence, physical activity and psycho-social determinants in Hong Kong Chinese children. J Sports Sci 2019; 37(2): 229-36.
  8. Carson V, Hunter S, Kuzik N, Wiebe SA, Spence JC, Friedman A, et al. Systematic review of physical activity and cognitive development in early childhood. J Sci Med Sport 2016; 19(7): 573-8.
  9. Savelsbergh G, Davids K, van der Kamp J, Bennett SJ. Development of movement coordination in children: Applications in the Field of ergonomics, health sciences and sport. New York, NY: Routledge; 2013.
  10. Rasmussen P, Gillberg C. Natural outcome of ADHD with developmental coordination disorder at age 22 years: A controlled, longitudinal, community-based study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2000; 39(11): 1424-31.
  11. Stephenson EA, Chesson RA. 'Always the guiding hand': Parents' accounts of the long-term implications of developmental co-ordination disorder for their children and families. Child Care Health Dev 2008; 34(3): 335-43.
  12. Venetsanou F, Kambas A, Ellinoudis T, Fatouros I, Giannakidou D, Kourtessis T. Can the movement assessment battery for children-test be the "gold standard" for the motor assessment of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder? Res Dev Disabil 2011; 32(1): 1-10.
  13. Bruininks RH. Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency: Examiner's manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1978.
  14. Kiphard EJ, Schilling F. Body-Coordination-Test for Children: KTK. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Test; 1974.
  15. Ulrich D. Test of gross motor development-2. Austin, TX: Pro.ed; 2000.
  16. Annlaug FM. Identification of children with motor coordination problems. Adapt Phys Act Q 1992; 9(4): 330-42.
  17. Henderson SE, Sugden D. Movement assessment battery for children. Sidcup, UK: Psychological Corporation; 1992.
  18. Salehi H, Afsorde Bakhshayesh R, Movahedi AR, Ghasemi V. Psychometric properties of a Persian version of the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire in boys aged 6-11 year-old. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals 2012; 1(4): 135-61. [In Persian].
  19. Wilson BN, Crawford SG, Green D, Roberts G, Aylott A, Kaplan BJ. Psychometric properties of the revised Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2009; 29(2): 182-202.
  20. Schoemaker MM, Smits-Engelsman BC, Jongmans MJ. Psychometric properties of the movement assessment battery for children-checklist as a screening instrument for children with a developmental co-ordination disorder. Br J Educ Psychol 2003; 73(Pt 3): 425-41.
  21. Gueze RH, Jongmans MJ, Schoemaker MM, Smits-Engelsman BC. Clinical and research diagnostic criteria for developmental coordination disorder: A review and discussion. Hum Mov Sci 2001; 20(1-2): 7-47.
  22. Chow SMK, Hsu YW, Henderson SE, Barnett AL, Lo SK. The movement ABC: A cross-cultural comparison of preschool children from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the USA. Adapt Phys Act Q 2006; 23(1): 31-48.
  23. Ros EXR. Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications. The UB Journal of psychology 2006; 37(1): 195-6.
  24. Stott DH. A General Test of Motor Impairment for Children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1966; 8(5): 523-31.
  25. Miyahara M, Tsujii M, Hanai T, Marian J, Barnett A, Henderson E, et al. The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: A preliminary investigation of its usefulness in Japan. Hum Mov Sci 1998; 17(4): 679-97.
  26. Smits-Engelsman BCM, Henderson SE, Michels CGJ. The assessment of children with Developmental Coordination Disorders in the Netherlands: The relationship between the Movement Assessment Battery for Children and the Körperkoordinations Test für Kinder. Hum Mov Sci 1998; 17(4): 699-709.
  27. Rosblad B, Gard L. The assessment of children with Developmental Coordination Disorders in Sweden: A preliminary investigation of the suitability of the Movement ABC. Hum Mov Sci 1998; 17(4): 711-9.
  28. Badami R, Nezakatalhossaini M, Rajabi F, Jafari M. Validity and reliability of Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) in 6-year-old children of Isfahan City. Development and Motor Learning (Harakat) 2015; 7(1): 105-22. [In Persian].
  29. Temme D, Kreis H, Hildebrandt L. PLS path modeling. Berlin, Germany: School of Business and Economics, Humboldt University of Berlin; 2006.
  30. Wright HC, Sugden DA, Ng R, Tan J. Identification of children with movement problems in Singapore: Usefulness of the Movement ABC Checklist. Adapt Phys Act Q 1994; 11(2): 150-7.
  31. Helen CW, David AS. The Nature of Developmental Coordination Disorder: Inter- and intragroup differences. Adapt Phys Act Q 1996; 13(4): 357-71.