The Effect of the Lower Leg Sensory Feedback on Force Sense of the Knee Extensor Muscles in Healthy Young Men: A Cross-Sectional Study

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors
Minoo Khalkhali-Zavieh 1
Bahram Amirshakeri 2
Abbas Soltani-Someh 2
Mina Ahmadi-Kahjoogh 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
10.22122/jrrs.v16i0.3631
Abstract
Introduction: Sensory information is essential for controlling and modulating muscle force. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the lower leg sensory feedback on the force sense of the knee extensor muscle.Materials and Methods: 22 healthy young men participated in this cross-sectional study through simple random sampling. Before and immediately following manipulation of skin sensory information, the mean error of three times of reproducition of the target force [50% of Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)] of the knee extensor muscles was measured using a special dynamometer and reported. The force sense of the knee extensor muscles was examined at an angle of 60 degrees of flexion. The test was conducted in three conditions: normal (control) state, after using a thick sponge on the distal end of the dominant leg, and after placing a bag of small ice blocks on the distal end of the dominant leg for 20 minutes. To evaluate the force sense, the force reproduction methods were used in ipsilateral and contralateral knee. Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-test were used to compare different conditions.Results: By manipulating the leg sensory information, no significant change was observed in the force reproduction error (absolute, constant, and variable errors) of the ipsilateral leg (P > 0.05). However, a significant change was observed in the force reproduction error in contralateral side (P < 0.05).Conclusion: It seems that the leg sensory information plays an important role in accurate perception of the force at contralateral knee joint. Therefore, signals delivered by the sensory afferents are important in understanding and controlling force.

Keywords

  1. Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev 2012; 92(4): 1651-97.
  2. Riemann BL, Myers JB, Lephart SM. Sensorimotor system measurement techniques. J Athl Train 2002; 37(1): 85-98.
  3. Cuisinier R, Olivier I, Troccaz J, Vuillerme N, Nougier V. Short-term memory effects of an auditory biofeedback on isometric force control: Is there a differential effect as a function of transition trials? Hum Mov Sci 2011; 30(3): 436-45.
  4. De Serres SJ, Fang NZ. The accuracy of perception of a pinch grip force in older adults. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 2004; 82(8-9): 693-701.
  5. Henningsen H, Knecht S, Ende-Henningsen B. Influence of afferent feedback on isometric fine force resolution in humans. Exp Brain Res 1997; 113(2): 207-13.
  6. Proske U. What is the role of muscle receptors in proprioception? Muscle Nerve 2005; 31(6): 780-7.
  7. Dover G, Powers ME. Reliability of joint position sense and force-reproduction measures during internal and external rotation of the shoulder. J Athl Train 2003; 38(4): 304-10.
  8. Adamo DE, Scotland S, Martin BJ. Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort. Exp Brain Res 2012; 217(2): 273-85.
  9. Park WH, Leonard CT, Li S. Finger force perception during ipsilateral and contralateral force matching tasks. Exp Brain Res 2008; 189(3): 301-10.
  10. Vuillerme N, Boisgontier M. Muscle fatigue degrades force sense at the ankle joint. Gait Posture 2008; 28(3): 521-4.
  11. Amirshakeri B, Khalkhali ZM, Rezasoltani A, Khademi Kalantari KH, Akbarzadeh A. The effect of lower leg sensory impulses on the force sense of knee extensor muscles in healthy adults: The accuracy of sense-of-force studies. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2019; 23(4): 739-45.
  12. Jones LA, Piateski E. Contribution of tactile feedback from the hand to the perception of force. Exp Brain Res 2006; 168(1-2): 298-302.
  13. Kilbreath SL, Refshauge K, Gandevia SC. Differential control of the digits of the human hand: evidence from digital anaesthesia and weight matching. Exp Brain Res 1997; 117(3): 507-11.
  14. Stevens JC. Thermal intensification of touch sensation: Further extensions of the Weber phenomenon. Sens Processes 1979; 3(3): 240-8.
  15. Majewski M, Susanne H, Klaus S. Epidemiology of athletic knee injuries: A 10-year study. Knee 2006; 13(3): 184-8.
  16. Levin KA. Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evid Based Dent 2006; 7(1): 24-5.
  17. Negahban H, Mostafaee N, Sohani SM, Mazaheri M, Goharpey S, Salavati M, et al. Reliability and validity of the Tegner and Marx activity rating scales in Iranian patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33(23-24): 2305-10.
  18. Galie J, Jones LA. Thermal cues and the perception of force. Exp Brain Res 2010; 200(1): 81-90.
  19. Zavieh MK, Amirshakeri B, Rezasoltani A, Talebi GA, Kalantari KK, Nedaey V, et al. Measurement of force sense reproduction in the knee joint: application of a new dynamometric device. J Phys Ther Sci 2016; 28(8): 2311-5.
  20. Raghu Prasad MS, Purswani S, Manivannan M. Force JND for Right Index Finger Using Contra Lateral Force Matching Paradigm. India: Springer India; 2013 p. 365-75.
  21. Simon AM, Kelly BM, Ferris DP. Sense of effort determines lower limb force production during dynamic movement in individuals with poststroke hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23(8): 811-8.
  22. Adamo DE, Martin BJ, Brown SH. Age-related differences in upper limb proprioceptive acuity. Percept Mot Skills 2007; 104(3 Pt 2): 1297-309.
  23. Bestas A, Erhan O, Okuducu M, Avci L, Yasar M. Cold and touch stimulation for the assessment of block level at spinal anesthesia. Clinical Research 2007; 12(1): 53-5.
  24. Smieja M, Hunt DL, Edelman D, Etchells E, Cornuz J, Simel DL. Clinical examination for the detection of protective sensation in the feet of diabetic patients. International Cooperative Group for Clinical Examination Research. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14(7): 418-24.
  25. Merrick MA, Knight KL, Ingersoll CD, Potteiger JA. The effects of ice and compression wraps on intramuscular temperatures at various depths. J Athl Train 1993; 28(3): 236-45.
  26. Myrer JW, Measom G, Fellingham GW. Temperature changes in the human leg during and after two methods of cryotherapy. J Athl Train 1998; 33(1): 25-9.
  27. Scotland S, Adamo DE, Martin BJ. Sense of effort revisited: relative contributions of sensory feedback and efferent copy. Neurosci Lett 2014; 561: 208-12.
  28. Boisgontier MP, Nougier V. Proprioception: Bilateral inputs first. Neurosci Lett 2013; 534: 96-100.
  29. Vuillerme N, Boisgontier M. Effectiveness of a tongue-placed electrotactile biofeedback to improve ankle force sense following plantar-flexor muscles fatigue. Gait Posture 2009; 30(4): 556-9.
  30. Tremblay F, Estephan L, Legendre M, Sulpher S. Influence of local cooling on proprioceptive acuity in the quadriceps muscle. J Athl Train 2001; 36(2): 119-23.
  31. Furmanek MP, Slomka KJ, Sobiesiak A, Rzepko M, Juras G. The effects of cryotherapy on knee joint position sense and force production sense in healthy individuals. J Hum Kinet 2018; 61: 39-51.
  32. Rupp KA, Herman DC, Hertel J, Saliba SA. Intramuscular temperature changes during and after 2 different cryotherapy interventions in healthy individuals. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2012; 42(8): 731-7.
  33. Dykstra JH, Hill HM, Miller MG, Cheatham CC, Michael TJ, Baker RJ. Comparisons of cubed ice, crushed ice, and wetted ice on intramuscular and surface temperature changes. J Athl Train 2009; 44(2): 136-41.
  34. Janwantanakul P. The effect of quantity of ice and size of contact area on ice pack/skin interface temperature. Physiotherapy 2009; 95(2): 120-5.
  35. Herrera E, Sandoval MC, Camargo DM, Salvini TF. Motor and sensory nerve conduction are affected differently by ice pack, ice massage, and cold water immersion. Phys Ther 2010; 90(4): 581-91.
  36. Cheung K, Hume P, Maxwell L. Delayed onset muscle soreness: Treatment strategies and performance factors. Sports Med 2003; 33(2): 145-64.
  37. Baker V, Bennell K, Stillman B, Cowan S, Crossley K. Abnormal knee joint position sense in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Res 2002; 20(2): 208-14.
  38. Mitchell M, Martin BJ, Adamo DE. Upper limb asymmetry in the sense of effort is dependent on force level. Front Psychol 2017; 8: 643.
  39. Monzee J, Lamarre Y, Smith AM. The effects of digital anesthesia on force control using a precision grip. J Neurophysiol 2003; 89(2): 672-83.
  40. Augurelle AS, Smith AM, Lejeune T, Thonnard JL. Importance of cutaneous feedback in maintaining a secure grip during manipulation of hand-held objects. J Neurophysiol 2003; 89(2): 665-71.
  41. Carson RG, Riek S, Shahbazpour N. Central and peripheral mediation of human force sensation following eccentric or concentric contractions. J Physiol 2002; 539(Pt 3): 913-25.
  42. Gandevia SC, McCloskey DI. Changes in motor commands, as shown by changes in perceived heaviness, during partial curarization and peripheral anaesthesia in man. J Physiol 1977; 272(3): 673-89.

Article View 43,079
PDF Download 34,748