The Effect of TheraBand® Corrective Exercise on Co-contraction of Ankle Joint in Men with Genu Valgum during Walking: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors
Farshad Ghorbanloo 1
AmirAli Jafarnezhadgero 2
Milad Alipour sari nasirloo 1
Amir Letafatkar 3
1 MSc Student, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Ir
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, School of Educational Sciences and Psychology, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Biomechanics and Sport Injuries, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
10.22122/jrrs.v15i5.3435
Abstract
Introduction: Malalignments in the lower limb can affect the biomechanics of human movements such as walking. The ankle joint has a major role in shock absorption, however abnormalities such as genu valgum can disrupt its function. The objective in this study is to investigate the effect of corrective exercise with ThraBand® on the ankle joint co-contraction in patients with genu valgum during walking.Materials and Methods: 24 male students (20-30 years old) were randomly divided into the two control and experimental groups. Corrective exercises were performed for 8 weeks using TheraBand® for the experimental group. The electrical activity of the selected muscles was recorded by the electromyography (ECG) device (Biometrics Ltd, UK). The statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS software and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) at the significant level of 0.050.Results: Findings in the experimental group showed that the general co-contraction of ankle joint increased significantly in the heel contact phase during the post-test phase compared to the pre-test phase (P =  0.044; d = 0.12). Other components did not show any significant differences (P > 0.050).Conclusion: Generally, increased co-contraction of ankle during the heel contact phase indicated greater ankle joint support after the corrective exercise.

Keywords

  1. Butler EE, Steele KM, Torburn L, Gamble JG, Rose J. Clinical motion analyses over eight consecutive years in a child with crouch gait: A case report. J Med Case Rep 2016; 10(1): 157.
  2. Punakallio A. Balance abilities of workers in physically demanding jobs with special reference to firefighters of different ages [Thesis]. Kuopio, Finland: University of Eastern Finland; 2004.
  3. Sundaram B, Doshi M, Pandian J. Postural stability during seven different standing tasks in persons with chronic low back pain - a cross-sectional study. Indian J Physiother Occup Ther 2012; 6(2): 22-7.
  4. Jafarnezhadgero A, Madadi-Shad M, McCrum C, Karamanidis K. Effects of corrective training on drop landing ground reaction force characteristics and lower limb kinematics in older adults with genu valgus: A randomized controlled trial. J Aging Phys Act 2019; 27(1): 9-17.
  5. Cote KP, Brunet ME, Gansneder BM, Shultz SJ. Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. J Athl Train 2005; 40(1): 41-6.
  6. Hunt GC. Examination of lower extremity dysfunction. In: J. Gould J, G. J. Davies GJ, editors. Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1990. p. 408–43.
  7. Mohammadi V, Letafatkar A, Sadeghi H, Jafarnezhadgero A, Hilfiker R. The effect of motor control training on kinetics variables of patients with non-specific low back pain and movement control impairment: Prospective observational study. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2017; 21(4): 1009-16.
  8. Johnson F, Leitl S, Waugh W. The distribution of load across the knee. A comparison of static and dynamic measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1980; 62(3): 346-9.
  9. Van Gheluwe B, Kirby KA, Hagman F. Effects of simulated genu valgum and genu varum on ground reaction forces and subtalar joint function during gait. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2005; 95(6): 531-41.
  10. Dorsey S.Williams, Irene S.McClay, Joseph H, Thomas S.Buchanan. Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic differences in runners with high and low arches. J Appl Biomech 2001; 17(2): 153-63.
  11. Felson DT, Niu J, Gross KD, Englund M, Sharma L, Cooke TD, et al. Valgus malalignment is a risk factor for lateral knee osteoarthritis incidence and progression: Findings from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2013; 65(2): 355-62.
  12. Leitch KM, Birmingham TB, Dunning CE, Giffin JR. Changes in valgus and varus alignment neutralize aberrant frontal plane knee moments in patients with unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. J Biomech 2013; 46(7): 1408-12.
  13. Namavarian N, Rezasoltani A, Rekabizadeh M. A study on the function of the knee muscles in genu varum and genu valgum. J Mod Rehabil 2014; 8(3): 1-9. [In Persian].
  14. Farahpour N, Jafarnezhad A, Damavandi M, Bakhtiari A, Allard P. Gait ground reaction force characteristics of low back pain patients with pronated foot and able-bodied individuals with and without foot pronation. J Biomech 2016; 49(9): 1705-10.
  15. Mikesky AE, Topp R, Wigglesworth JK, Harsha DM, Edwards JE. Efficacy of a home-based training program for older adults using elastic tubing. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1994; 69(4): 316-20.
  16. McMaster D, Cronin J, McGuigan M. Forms of variable resistance training. Strength Cond J 2009; 31(1): 50-64.
  17. Hubley-Kozey C, Deluzio K, Dunbar M. Muscle co-activation patterns during walking in those with severe knee osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008; 23(1): 71-80.
  18. Lloyd DG, Buchanan TS. Strategies of muscular support of varus and valgus isometric loads at the human knee. J Biomech 2001; 34(10): 1257-67.
  19. Rabiei M, Jafarnejhad Gre T, Binabaji H, Hosseininejad E, Anbarian M. Assessment of postural response after sudden perturbation in subjects with genu valgum. J Shahrekord Univ Med Sci 2012; 14(2): 90-100. [In Persian].
  20. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2004 [Online]. Available from: URL: www.wma.net › what-we-do › medical-ethics › declaration-of-helsinki
  21. Becker J. Effectiveness of the StreetStrider as an exercise modality for healthy adults [MSc Thesis]. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin; 2011.
  22. Farahpour N, Jafarnezhadgero A, Allard P, Majlesi M. Muscle activity and kinetics of lower limbs during walking in pronated feet individuals with and without low back pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2018; 39: 35-41.
  23. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2000; 10(5): 361-74.
  24. Heiden TL, Lloyd DG, Ackland TR. Knee joint kinematics, kinetics and muscle co-contraction in knee osteoarthritis patient gait. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2009; 24(10): 833-41.
  25. Cohen, J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence; 1988.
  26. Hunt MA, Birmingham TB, Giffin JR, Jenkyn TR. Associations among knee adduction moment, frontal plane ground reaction force, and lever arm during walking in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Biomech 2006; 39(12): 2213-20.
  27. Nguyen AD, Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ, Luecht RM, Perrin DH. A preliminary multifactorial approach describing the relationships among lower extremity alignment, hip muscle activation, and lower extremity joint excursion. J Athl Train 2011; 46(3): 246-56.
  28. Macrum E, Bell DR, Boling M, Lewek M, Padua D. Effect of limiting ankle-dorsiflexion range of motion on lower extremity kinematics and muscle-activation patterns during a squat. J Sport Rehabil 2012; 21(2): 144-50.
  29. Markolf KL, Burchfield DM, Shapiro MM, Shepard MF, Finerman GA, Slauterbeck JL. Combined knee loading states that generate high anterior cruciate ligament forces. J Orthop Res 1995; 13(6): 930-5.
  30. Zeller BL, McCrory JL, Kibler WB, Uhl TL. Differences in kinematics and electromyographic activity between men and women during the single-legged squat. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31(3): 449-56.
  31. Czerniecki JM. Foot and ankle biomechanics in walking and running. A review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 67(6): 246-52.
  32. De Luca CJ, Erim Z. Common drive in motor units of a synergistic muscle pair. J Neurophysiol 2002; 87(4): 2200-4.
  33. Gardinier E. The relationship between muscular co-contraction and dynamic knee stiffness in ACL-deficient non-copers [BSc Thesis]. Newark, DE: University of Delaware; 2009.
  34. Setton LA, Mow VC, Howell DS. Mechanical behavior of articular cartilage in shear is altered by transection of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Orthop Res 1995; 13(4): 473-82.
  35. Nyland J, Smith S, Beickman K, Armsey T, Caborn DN. Frontal plane knee angle affects dynamic postural control strategy during unilateral stance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34(7): 1150-7.s
  36. Kinakin K. Optimal muscle training: Biomechanics of lifting for maximum growth and strength with DVD. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2009. p. 49.
Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences
Volume 15, Issue 5 - Serial Number 5
November 2019
Pages 249-255

Article View 10,648
PDF Download 4,157