Exploring the Viability of Augmented Reality-based Cognitive Therapy of Poor Working Memory in Lifelong English for Medical Purposes (EMP) Comprehension: A Complementarity Study

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors
Saeed Khazaie 1
Reza Torabi 1
Abbas Saghaei 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language, School of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Electrical Engineering, School of Engineering, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
10.22122/jrrs.v15i3.3492
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of cognitive therapy of poor working memory (WM) in students through self-generated augmented-reality (AR) based flipped English for Medical Purposes (EMP) reading classes on quality of students' academic and professional lives.Materials and Methods: This complementarity study was conducted using the semi-experimental method with a cross-contextual (continuous and real-workplace) assessment design along with soliciting attitudes and debriefing perception in the very initial and final phases, respectively. In the academic year 2018, after determining the WM capacities of 210 students of medicine from Medical University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran, they were randomly divided into seven heterogeneous groups with high visual and/or high verbal WM heads to practice EMP reading comprehension in 18 self-generated AR-based sessions; in each session, they were simultaneously assessed in both instructional-learning context and field.Results: Student active engagement in self-generating AR-based sessions spread the intrinsic cognitive load of EMP reading materials for students with low WM capacity, suggesting that students are inclined to active-participation courses.Conclusion: Student active participation in self-generating AR-based activities played a crucial role in cognitive therapy of students' psychological reading process and promoting EMP reading comprehension. However, the results should be viewed as suggestive.

Keywords

  1. Ascione L. Five key priorities for today's superintendents. Eschool News [Online]. [cited 2018 Sep 17]; Available from: URL: https://eschoolnews.com/2018/09/17/5-key-priorities-for-todays-superintendents/?ps
  2. Sumardi S. Using voicespice to spice up ESP/EFL teaching: Experience of ELT Teachers in an aviation training center. Journal of Foreign Language Education and Technology 2019; 4(2): 179-205.
  3. Celik H. A closer look into an ESP course through students' end-of-course evaluations: a case study. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes 2018; 6(1): 125-39.
  4. Gu H, Bo H, Ren L. Developing ESP teaching materials based on the analysis of information engineering majors' needs. Open J Soc 2019; 7: 121-31.
  5. Stojkovic N, Bakic-Miric N. Positioning English for specific purposes in an English language teaching context. Wilmington, DE: Vernon Press; 2018.
  6. Niman N. The gamification of higher education: Developing a game-based business strategy in a disrupted marketplace. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan US; 2014.
  7. Auphan P, Ecalle J, Magnan A. Computer-based assessment of reading ability and subtypes of readers with reading comprehension difficulties: A study in French children from G2 to G9. Eur J Psychol Educ 2019; 34(3): 641-63.
  8. Meena B. Mass Job Shortages, Leaks, Scams and a Call for Educational Reform [Online]. [cited 2018 Jun 27]; Available from: URL: https://edtechreview.in/trends-insights/insights/3235-mass-job-shortages-leaks-scams-and-a-call-for-educational-reform
  9. Carlson SE, Seipel B, McMaster K. Development of a new reading comprehension assessment: Identifying comprehension differences among readers. Learn Individ Differ 2014; 32: 40-53.
  10. Chen NS, Hsieh SW, Kinshuk. Effects of short-term memory and content representation type on mobile language learning. Language Learning and Technology 2008; 12(3): 93-113.
  11. Saeed K, Saeed K. Contribution to vocabulary learning via mobiles. English Language Teaching 2011; 4(1): 174-84.
  12. Swanson HL, Kong JE. Working memory and reading: Is there evidence for an executive processing deficit? Executive function in education: From theory to practice. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2018. p. 218-39.
  13. Brandenburg J, Klesczewski J, Fischbach A, Schuchardt K, Buttner G, Hasselhorn M. Working memory in children with learning disabilities in reading versus spelling: searching for overlapping and specific cognitive factors. J Learn Disabil 2015; 48(6): 622-34.
  14. Nouwens S, Groen MA, Verhoeven L. How working memory relates to children's reading comprehension: the importance of domain-specificity in storage and processing. Read Writ 2017; 30(1): 105-20.
  15. Peng P, Barnes M, Wang C, Wang W, Li S, Swanson HL, et al. A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychol Bull 2018; 144(1): 48-76.
  16. Khan S. Can VR Impact Higher Ed Classroom? [Online]. [cited 2020 Jan 13]; Available from: URL: https://edtechreview.in/research/3822-vr-virtual-reality-higher-education-classroom-college-university
  17. Prensky M. How to Teach with technology: keeping both teachers and students comfortable in an era of exponential change. Emerging Technologies for Learning 2007; 2(4): 40-6.
  18. Stiller KD, Schworm S. Game-based learning of the structure and functioning of body cells in a foreign language: Effects on motivation, cognitive load, and performance. Front Educ 2019; 4.
  19. Green CS, Seitz AR. The impacts of video games on cognition (and how the government can guide the industry). Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci 2015; 2(1): 101-10.
  20. Soulunii S. Central Square Foundation Aims to Make EdTech Systematically Reach the Last Mile Through its EdTech Lab Initiative [Online]. [cited 2020 Feb 7]; Available from: URL: https://edtechreview.in/research/3865-making-edtech-in-india-systematically-reach-the-last-mile
  21. Tobar-Munoz H, Baldiris S, Fabregat Rn. Augmented reality game-based learning: Enriching students' experience during reading comprehension activities. J Educ Comput Res 2017; 55(7): 901-36.
  22. Shokrpour N, Torabi R, Khazaie S. Tiered or nonontiered coaching: Exploring the applicability of differentiated instruction in AR-m-game-supported flipped classrooms of EMP reading comprehension skills. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language, Discourse, and Pragmatics; 2018 Oct 29; Ahvaz, Iran.
  23. Zielinski D. Can playing games help students master concepts from general psychology classes? Int J Game Base Learn 2019; 9(2): 55-72.
  24. Squires DR. Working memory and augmented reality's trajectory: A literature review of AR in education, online learning, workforce training, and working memory research. J Educ Technol 2017; 14(3): 55-63.
  25. Juan MC, Mendez-Lopez M, Perez-Hernandez E, Albiol-Perez S. Augmented reality for the assessment of children's spatial memory in real settings. PLoS One 2014; 9(12): e113751.
  26. Torous J, Levin ME, Ahern DK, Oser ML. Cognitive behavioral mobile applications: clinical studies, marketplace overview, and research agenda. Cogn Behav Pract 2017; 24(2): 215-25.
  27. Abbott D. Game-based learning for postgraduates: An empirical study of an educational game to teach research skills. High Educ Pedago 2019; 4(1): 80-104.
  28. Csikszentmihalyi M, Robinson RE. The art of seeing: an interpretation of the aesthetic encounter. Los Angeles, CA: J.P. Getty Museum; 1990.
  29. Ackerman CE. 25 CBT Techniques and Worksheets for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy [Online]. [cited 2020 Jul 4]; Available from: URL: https://positivepsychology.com/cbt-cognitive-behavioral-therapy-techniques-worksheets/
  30. Tanabe A, Osaka N. Picture span test: Measuring visual working memory capacity involved in remembering and comprehension. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41(2): 309-17.
  31. Akbari Z. English for the students of health information technology. Isfahan, Iran: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; 2016.
  32. Torabi R. English for the students of speech therapy. Isfahan, Iran: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; 2014.
  33. Kayhani AR, Barekat F, Akbari A, Torabi, R. English for the students of nursing. Tehran, Iran: SAMT; 2018.
  34. Abbasnejad M, Khodabandeh S, Dortaj F. English for the students of anesthesia. Tehran, Iran: SAMT; 2018.
  35. Djazayery A. English for the students of nutrition. Tehran, Iran: SAMT; 2016.
  36. Omid A, Yammani N, Heidari K, Mousavi T, Mousavi A. educational needs of general practitioners who enrolled as family physicians in national family medicine program and referral system. Iran J Med Educ 2013; 13(6): 470-9. [In Persian].
  37. Schwartz R. The Three Cueing Systems in Beginning Reading Instruction: Good Idea or Hoax? [Online]. [cited 2019 Sep 30]; Available from: URL: https://readingrecovery.org/the-three-cueing-systems-in-beginning-reading-instruction-good-idea-or-hoax/
Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences
Volume 15, Issue 3 - Serial Number 3
August 2019
Pages 152-162

Article View 10,457
PDF Download 3,448