Description of Paralympic Athletic Talent Development Environment

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors
Sahar Mahmodi 1
Rokhsareh Badami 1
Zohreh Meshkati 2
Rasol Nazari 2
1 PhD Student, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education and Sport Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
10.22122/jrrs.v14i5.3359
Abstract
Introduction: The contemporary studies seek to describe the appropriate environments for athletic talent development by changing procedure instead of talent identification, which is a tedious process that sometimes does not yield the desirable result. Accordingly, some studies have described the athletic talent development environment, but only a few studies have described Paralympic athletic talent development environment. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to describe Para-Asian and Paralympic athletic talent development environment.Materials and Methods: The current research was a descriptive-correlational study. The study participants consisted of 150 athletes (46 women and 104 men) who participated in the teenage and youth Para-Asian and Paralympic games between the years 2014-2018. The participants were selected using convenience sampling method. In this study, Talent Development Environment Questionnaire for Sport was used. This questionnaire comprises seven subscales: “long-term development focus”, “quality preparation”, “communication”, “understanding the athlete”, “support network”, “challenging and supportive environment”, and “long-term development fundamentals”. The obtained data were analyzed using one-sample t test.Results: The means of the four subscales of “long-term development focus” (P = 0.001), “communication” (P = 0.001), “challenging and supportive environment” (P = 0.001), and “long-term development fundamentals” (P = 0.001), were higher than average. The means of the two subscales of “support network” (P = 0.450) and “understanding the athlete” (P = 0.360) were at a moderate level. The mean of “quality preparation” (P = 0.035) was less than average.Conclusion: In talent development environment for athletes with disability, more attention should be paid to providing the athletes with continuous and always-available support of coaching staff as well as services and facilities. Additionally, the coaches should pay more attention to the athlete’s physical and mental health; so that the athlete feels his/her health is important to the coach.

Keywords

  1. World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2008.
  2. Albrecht GL, Seelman K, Bury M. Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2001.
  3. Ghaedrahmati S, Dehbashi M. Relationship between health services and disability status in the provinces of the country. Social Welfare 2014; 13(50): 333-51. [In Persian].
  4. Lubans D, Richards J, Hillman C, Faulkner G, Beauchamp M, Nilsson M, et al. Physical activity for cognitive and mental health in youth: A systematic review of mechanisms. Pediatrics 2016; 138(3): e20161642.
  5. Mohammadi B. Sports talent identification. 1st ed. Tehran, Iran: Elm va Harekat Publications; 2012. p. 19-20. [In Persian].
  6. Henriksen K, Stambulova N, Roessler KK. Riding the wave of an expert: A successful talent development environment in kayaking. Sport Psychol 2011; 25(3): 341-62.
  7. Mudege SM. Factors associated with successful talent development in South African soccer players [MSc Thesis]. Port Elizabeth, South Africa; Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University; 2011.
  8. Radtke S, Doll-Tepper G. A cross-cultural comparison of talent identification and development in Paralympic sports. Perceptions and opinions of athletes, coaches and officials. Berlin Germany: Free University; 2014.
  9. Clark JE. On becoming skillful: patterns and constraints. Res Q Exerc Sport 1995; 66(3): 173-83.
  10. Adeyanju FB. Nigerian Women and Sports Participation: Stereotypical Misconceptions, Reality and Future Projections. In: Adedoja TA, Mshelia B, Onifade A, editors. Psychosocial Perspectives of Sports. Lagos, Nigeria: Vertex Diamond Nig. Publishers; 1993.
  11. Gashtasbi A. Identification and prioritization of the preventive and driving factors of physical-disabled participation in physical activity in Shiraz [MSc Thesis]. Ahvaz, Iran: Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz; 2012. [In Persian].
  12. Sobhani A, Andam R, Zarifi M. Study and prioritizing the factors and barriers to sport participation of disabled people of Ahvaz City. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies 2015; 2(6): 41-8. [In Persian].
  13. Westermark M. Talent development in female football: What characterizes a successful environment? [MSc Thesis]. Umea, Sweden: Umea University; 2016.
  14. Jimenez AS. Developpement du sport pour les personnes handicapees en Colombie: dynamiques et resistances [PhD Thesis]. Brest, France: University of Western Brittany; 2012. [In French].
  15. Omar-Fauzee MS, Mohd-Ali M, Geok SK, Ibrahim N. The participation motive in the paralympics. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences 2010; 2(1): 250-72.
  16. Martindale R, Collins D, Wang J, McNeill M, Sonk K, Sproule J, et al. Development of the Talent Development Environment Questionnaire for Sport. J Sports Sci 2010; 28(11): 1209-21.
  17. Tizro M, Badami R. Description of the environment of talent development for elite adolescent basketball players and its relationship with mental skills. Sport Psychology Studies 2018; 7(23): 51-66. [In Persian].
  18. Tan Li San A, Low F. Developmental practice activities of elite youth swimmers. Movement, Health and Exercise 2014; 3: 27-37.
  19. Baker J, Cote J, Abernethy B. Sport-specific practice and the development of expert decision-making in team ball sports.
  20. J Appl Sport Psychol 2003; 15(1): 12-25.
  21. Firuzi M, Razavi MH, Farzan F. The challenges and difficulties of the medal running, rowing and swimming Iran. Journal of Sport Management and Motor Behavior 2012; 8(15): 37-66. [In Persian].
  22. Cote J. The influence of the family in the development of talent in sport. Sport Psychol 1999; 13(4): 395-417.
  23. Cote J, Hay J. Children's involvement in sport: A developmental perspective. In: Silva JM, Stevens DE, editors. Psychological Foundations of Sport. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2002. p. 484-502.
  24. Cote J, Fraser-Thomas J. Play, practice, and athlete development. In: Farrow D, Baker J, MacMahon C, editors. Developing sport expertise: Lessons from theory and practice.London, UK: Routledge; 2007. p. 17-28.
  25. Mills A, Butt J, Maynard I, Harwood C. Identifying factors perceived to influence the development of elite youth football academy players. J Sport Sci 2012; 30(15): 1593-604.
  26. Brackenridge C. The parents’ optimum zone: Measuring and optimising parental engagement in youth sport. Proceedings of 13th Commonwealth International Sports Conference; 2006 Mar 9-12; Melbourne, Australia.
  27. Dinli S, Badami R. The role of social support in the nursing acquisition process of national and international athletes. Social Sciences 2017; 10(3): 129-38. [In Persian].
  28. Martindale R, Mortimer P. Talent development environments: key considerations for effective practice. In: Collins D, Button A, Richards H, editors. Performance psychology. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 65-84.
  29. Henriksen K, Stambulova N, Roessler KK. Successful talent development in track and field: considering the role of environment. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20(Suppl 2): 122-32.
  30. Wolfenden LE, Holt NL. Talent development in elite junior tennis: perceptions of players, parents, and coaches. J Appl Sport Psychol 2005; 17(2): 108-26.
  31. Li C, Wang CKJ, Pyun DY. Talent development environmental factors in sport: A Review and taxonomic classification. Quest 2014; 66(4): 433-47.
  32. Campbell E, Jones G. Sources of stress experienced by elite male wheelchair basketball players. Adapt Phys Activ Q 2002; 19(1): 82-99.
  33. Durand-Bush N, Salmela J, Green-Demers I. The Ottawa mental skills assessment tool (OMSAT-3*). Sport Psychol 2001; 15: 1-19.
  34. Freimuth U. Vietnamese track-and-field athletes are heroes [Online]. [cited 2010 Mar 21]; Available from: URL: http://travel.org.vn/in-depth/interviews/2010/03/ldquovietnamese-trackandfield-athletes-are-heroesrdquo.html
  35. Bloom BS, Sosniak LA. Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine Books; 1985.
  36. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol Rev 1993; 100(3): 363–406.
  37. Dieffenbach K, Statler T, Moffett A. Pre and post games perceptions of factors influencing coach and athlete performance at the Beijing Paralympics. Colorado Springs, CO: USOC and Paralympic; 2009.
  38. Kellmann M. Enhancing recovery: Preventing underperformance in athletes. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2002.
Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences
Volume 14, Issue 5 - Serial Number 5
November 2018
Pages 296-302

Article View 12,844
PDF Download 7,775