Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences

Observational Study of Weight Distribution on the Feet and Moment Arm of the Ground Reaction Force around the Ankle in Standing Position in Women with Flatfoot

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Sport Physiology, School of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 School of Sport Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

10.22122/jrrs.v14i5.3358

Abstract

Introduction: By reduction or absence of the medial longitudinal arch in flatfoot deformity, a large part of the contact forces of the body weight transmit to the upper joints. The present study investigated weight distribution on the feet and the external moment around the ankle in women with flatfoot.Materials and Methods: The statistical population included women students aged 19 to 25 years in Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. The control group was composed of twelve healthy women, and 37 with flatfoot deformity were divided into three experimental groups. Those in the experimental group 1 had unilateral flatfoot deformity, group 2 had rigid bilateral flatfoot deformity, and group 3 had flexible bilateral flatfoot deformity. The displacement of the center of pressure in the mediolateral and anteroposterior directions was calculated for assessing weight distribution on the feet and the external moment around the ankles. Force plate and 8 motion analysis cameras were used to collect data. MATLAB and SPSS software were used to calculate the displacement of the center of pressure and statistical analysis, respectively.Results: Experimental groups 2 and 3 and the control group significantly used the right foot for carrying body weight (P < 0.01); while in the experimental group 1, there was no significant difference in weight distribution on a flat or normal foot. There was no significant difference in the mean displacement of the center of pressure between the experimental and control groups. Only in experimental groups 2 and 3, there was a significant difference between the mean displacement of the center of foot pressure under the right and left feet (P = 0.02).Conclusion: Women with bilateral flatfoot are more subjected to external moment acting on one foot, which is the same foot that bears body weight in a standing position for a longer time.

Keywords

  1. Napolitano C, Walsh S, Mahoney L, McCrea J. Risk factors that may adversely modify the natural history of the pediatric pronated foot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2000; 17(3): 397-417.
  2. Eldesoky MT, Abutaleb EE. Influence of bilateral and unilateral flatfoot on pelvic alignment. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 2015; 9(8): 641-5.
  3. Abaraogu UO, Onyeka C, Ucheagwu C, Ozioko M. Association between flatfoot and age is mediated by sex: A cross-sectional study. Pol Ann Med 2019; 23(2): 141-6.
  4. Eluwa M, Omini R, Kpela T, Ekanem T, Akpantah A. The incidence of pes planus amongst Akwa Ibom State students in the University of Calabar. The Internet Journal of Forensic Science 2009; 3(2): 1-5.
  5. Arunakul M, Amendola A, Gao Y, Goetz JE, Femino JE, Phisitkul P. Tripod index: A new radiographic parameter assessing foot alignment. Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34(10): 1411-20.
  6. Dyal CM, Feder J, Deland JT, Thompson FM. Pes planus in patients with posterior tibial tendon insufficiency: Asymptomatic versus symptomatic foot. Foot Ankle Int 1997; 18(2): 85-8.
  7. Tiberio D. Pathomechanics of structural foot deformities. Phys Ther 1988; 68(12): 1840-9.
  8. Letafatkar A, Zandi S, Khodayi M, Vashmesara JB. Flat foot deformity, Q angle and knee pain are interrelated in wrestlers. J Nov Physiother 2013; 3(2): 138.
  9. Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 1995; 3(4): 193-214.
  10. Gutnik B, Leaver J, Standen C, Longley C. Inferred influence of human lateral profile on limb load asymmetry during a quiet standing balance test. Acta Med Okayama 2008; 62(3): 175-84.
  11. Chang HW, Chieh HF, Lin CJ, Su FC, Tsai MJ. The relationships between foot arch volumes and dynamic plantar pressure during midstance of walking in preschool children. PLoS One 2014; 9(4): e94535.
  12. Periyasamy R, Anand S. The effect of foot arch on plantar pressure distribution during standing. J Med Eng Technol 2013; 37(5): 342-7.
  13. Pauk J, Daunoraviciene K, Ihnatouski M, Griskevicius J, Raso JV. Analysis of the plantar pressure distribution in children with foot deformities. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2010; 12(1): 29-34.
  14. Stodolka J, Sobera M. Symmetry of lower limb loading in healthy adults during normal and abnormal stance. Acta Bioeng Biomech 2017; 19(3): 93-100.
  15. Kirby KA. Longitudinal arch load-sharing system of the foot. Revista Espanola de Podologia 2017; 28(1): e18-e26.
  16. Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Phys Ther 1987; 67(5): 688-94.
  17. Burkett B. The skeletal system: The axial skeleton. In: Tortora GJ, Derrickson BH, editor. Principles of anatomy and physiology. 15th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons; 2016. p. 239-66.
  18. Jung DY, Koh EK, Kwon OY. Effect of foot orthoses and short-foot exercise on the cross-sectional area of the abductor hallucis muscle in subjects with pes planus: a randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2011; 24(4): 225-31.
  19. Lee JE, Park GH, Lee YS, Kim MK. A comparison of muscle activities in the lower extremity between flat and normal feet during one-leg standing. J Phys Ther Sci 2013; 25(9): 1059-61.
  20. Kim KJ, Uchiyama E, Kitaoka HB, An KN. An in vitro study of individual ankle muscle actions on the center of pressure. Gait Posture 2003; 17(2): 125-31.
  21. Tahmasebi R, Karimi MT, Satvati B, Fatoye F. Evaluation of standing stability in individuals with flatfeet. Foot Ankle Spec 2015; 8(3): 168-74.
  22. Chao TC, Jiang BC. A Comparison of postural stability during upright standing between normal and flatfooted individuals, based on COP-based measures. Entropy 2017; 19(2): 76.
  23. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39(2): 175-91.
  24. Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, Hauser G, Sluga M. Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics 2006; 118(2): 634-9.
  25. Maestre-Rendon JR, Rivera-Roman TA, Sierra-Hernandez JM, Cruz-Aceves I, Contreras-Medina LM, Duarte-Galvan C, et al. Low computational-cost footprint deformities diagnosis sensor through angles, dimensions analysis and image processing techniques. Sensors (Basel) 2017; 17(11).
  26. Soper C, Hume P, Cheung K, Benschop A. Foot morphology of junior football players: implications for football shoe design. Proceedings of the Conference: Developing sport - the next steps: conference 2001; Wellington, New Zealand.
  27. Onodera AN, Sacco IC, Morioka EH, Souza PS, de Sa MR, Amadio AC. What is the best method for child longitudinal plantar arch assessment and when does arch maturation occur? Foot (Edinb) 2008; 18(3): 142-9.
  28. Aenumulapalli A, Kulkarni MM, Gandotra AR. Prevalence of flexible flat foot in adults: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11(6): AC17-AC20.
  29. Lee YC, Lin G, Wang MJ. Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement methods. J Foot Ankle Res 2014; 7(1): 44.
  30. Shariff SM, Manaharan TV, Shariff AA, Merican AF. Evaluation of foot arch in adult women: Comparison between five different footprint parameters. Sains Malaysiana 2017; 46(10): 1839-48.
  31. Pezzan Patricia AO, Sacco Isabel CN, Joao Silvia MA. Foot posture and classification of the plantar arch among adolescent wearers and non-wearers of high-heeled shoes. Rev Bras Fisioter 2009; 13(5): 398-404.
  32. Queen RM, Mall NA, Hardaker WM, Nunley JA. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system. Foot Ankle Int 2007; 28(4): 456-62.
  33. Ledoux WR, Hillstrom HJ. The distributed plantar vertical force of neutrally aligned and pes planus feet. Gait Posture 2002; 15(1): 1-9.
  34. Ghazaleh L, Anbarian M, Damavandi M. Prediction of body center of mass acceleration from trunk and lower limb joints accelerations during quiet standing. Physicl Treatment 2017; 7(2):103-12.
  35. Prado-Rico JM, Duarte M. Asymmetry of body weight distribution during quiet and relaxed standing tasks. Motor Control 2019; 1-13. [Epub ahead of print].
  36. Levinger P, Murley GS, Barton CJ, Cotchett MP, McSweeney SR, Menz HB. A comparison of foot kinematics in people with normal- and flat-arched feet using the Oxford Foot Model. Gait Posture 2010; 32(4): 519-23.
  37. Iijima H, Ohi H, Isho T, Aoyama T, Fukutani N, Kaneda E, et al. Association of bilateral flat feet with knee pain and disability in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A cross-sectional study. J Orthop Res 2017; 35(11): 2490-8.
  38. Jung DY, Kim MH, Koh EK, Kwon OY, Cynn HS, Lee WH. A comparison in the muscle activity of the abductor hallucis and the medial longitudinal arch angle during toe curl and short foot exercises. Phys Ther Sport 2011; 12(1): 30-5.
Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences
Volume 14, Issue 5 - Serial Number 5
November 2018
Pages 257-265
  • Receive Date: 30 July 2019
  • Revise Date: 23 May 2022
  • Accept Date: 22 May 2022