The Effect of Task Constraints Manipulation on Motor Skill Learning in Children

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 PhD Student, Department of Motor Behavior, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Motor Behavior, School of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22122/jrrs.v13i2.2851

Abstract

Introduction: Acquisition of a skill is affected by constraints. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of task constraints manipulation on motor skill learning in children.Materials and Methods: This quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design was conducted on 20 primary school children of 10-12 years of age. The subjects were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into two groups (training with scaled equipment and standard equipment). Acquisition phase included 5 sessions and each session consisted of 50 trials. Tests were performed with ball sizes of 5, 6, and 7 and ring height of 2.60 m, 2.80 m, and 3.05 m, respectively. Transfer test was performed 10 minutes after the last trial on the last day of acquisition phase using a size 6 ball. The retention test was conducted 24 hours after the last session of acquisition. Data were analyzed using mixed-design ANOVA, and paired and independent t-test at the significance level of 0.05.Results: Significant differences were not found between the 2 groups in terms of accuracy in the retention and transfer tests (P > 0.05). However, the pattern of throwing with scaled equipment was better in the practice group compared to the standard group.Conclusion: According the results of this study, it can be concluded that the use of scaled equipment leads to better learning of movement pattern in children.

Keywords

  1. Renshaw I, Chow JY, Davids Keith W, Hammond J. A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: A basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Phys Educ Sport Pedagogy 2010; 15(2): 117-37. [In Persian].
  2. Pellett TL, Henschel-Pellett HA, Harrison JM. Influence of ball weight on junior high school girls' volleyball performance. Percept Mot Skills 1994; 78(3 Pt 2): 1379-84.
  3. Farrow D, Reid M. The effect of equipment scaling on the skill acquisition of beginning tennis players. J Sports Sci 2010; 28(7): 723-32.
  4. Kachel K, Buszard T, Reid M. The effect of ball compression on the match-play characteristics of elite junior tennis players. J Sports Sci 2015; 33(3): 320-6.
  5. Buszard T, Reid M, Masters RS, Farrow D. Scaling tennis racquets during PE in primary school to enhance motor skill acquisition. Res Q Exerc Sport 2016; 87(4): 414-20.
  6. Davids K, Button C, Bennett S. Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008.
  7. Timmerman E, De Water J, Kachel K, Reid M, Farrow D, Savelsbergh G. The effect of equipment scaling on children's sport performance: the case for tennis. J Sports Sci 2015; 33(10): 1093-100.
  8. Arias JL, Argudo FM, Alonso JI. Distances and shooting zones as a function of mass of basketball among 9- to 11-year-old male players. S Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreation 2012; 34(1): 1-11.
  9. Hodges N, Williams AM. Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice. London, UK: Routledge; 2012.
  10. Buszard T, Farrow D, Reid M, Masters RS. Scaling sporting equipment for children promotes implicit processes during performance. Conscious Cogn 2014; 30: 247-55.
  11. Hasan Barani F, Abdoli B, Farsi A. Effect of errorless and errorful learning on performance kinematic parameters in a throwing task: A pilot study. J Lasers Med Sci 2014; 9(6): 978-90. [In Persian].
  12. Johnson L. Explicit and implicit motor learning during early gait rehabilitation post stroke [Doctoral Thesis]. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton, Faculty of Health Sciences; 2014.
  13. Arias JL, Argudo FM, Alonso JI. Effect of basketball mass on shot performance among 9-11 year-old male players. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2012; 7(1): 69-79.
  14. Hammond J, Smith C. Low compression tennis balls and skill development. J Sports Sci Med 2006; 5(4): 575-81.
  15. Wulf G, Raupach M, Pfeiffer F. Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Res Q Exerc Sport 2005; 76(1): 107-11.
  16. Salehi H. The effects of contextual interference on the method and result of the shooting basketball performance. Motor Behavior and Sport Psychology 2011; 2(7): 45-62. [In Persian].
  17. Hardy L, Parfitt G. A catastrophe model of anxiety and performance. Br J Psychol 1991; 82 (Pt 2): 163-78.
  18. Keayvanlou F, Seyedahmadi M, Farrokh Z, Samadi H, Koshan M, Khalil Arjmandi M. The effect of practice schedules on the acquisition, retention and transfer of generalized motor program. J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci 2012; 18(4): 272-9. [In Persian].
  19. Schmidt R, Lee T. Motor learning and performance with web study guide: From principles to application. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2014.
  20. Buszard T, Farrow D, Zhu FF, Masters RSW. Examining movement specific reinvestment and working memory capacity in adults and children. Int J Sport Psychol 2013; 44(4): 351-66.
  21. Guadagnoli MA, Lee TD. Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J Mot Behav 2004; 36(2): 212-24.
  22. Chiviacowsky S. Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 2014; 15(5): 505-10.
  23. Wulf G, Chiviacowsky S, Cardozo PL. Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Hum Mov Sci 2014; 37: 12-20.
  • Receive Date: 21 July 2017
  • Revise Date: 15 April 2024
  • Accept Date: 22 May 2022