Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences

Comparison of Vocal Tract Discomfort Symptoms and Acoustic Features in Patients with Gastro Esophageal Reflux (GER) and Laryngo Pharyngeal Reflux (LPR)

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Instructor, Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 MSc Student, Student Research Committee (Treata), Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

10.22122/jrrs.v13i2.2822

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) are associated with voice disorders, which cause changes in the structure of the vocal cords and subsequently changes in the voice quality and unpleasant feelings. Since LPR is stronger and has more direct impact on the laryngopharyngeal mucosa and vocal cords than the GERD, it is supposed to create more stable sensory symptoms and acoustic features. Therefore, this study aimed to examine and compare patients with LPR and GERD as well as their acoustic features and vocal tract discomfort (VTD) symptoms.Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive-analytic study included 17 patients with GERD and 18 patients with LPR. The voices of patients were recorded in an acoustic room (noise 28 dB). Besides, both groups of patients were asked to complete the VTDs. Then, acoustic features were analyzed using praat software. In addition, the frequency and severity scores of the VTDs were analyzed via SPSS software.Results: Baseline frequency, jitter (local), and shimmer (local), and also harmonic-to-noise ratio were not significantly different between the two groups. Meanwhile, the severity of soreness and the frequency and severity of pain were significant between the two groups.Conclusion: The severity and the frequency of pain and the frequency of soreness are more prevalent in patients suffering from LPR than the patients with GERD. LPR has more destructive effects on the acoustic features and the vocal tracts of patients with LPR, due to its stronger involvement with the laryngopharyngeal space. Therefore, patients with voice disorders indicating higher scores than normal in VTD must be examined for LPR, although they do not show symptoms of heartburn or acid reflux.

Keywords

  1. Ozturan O, Dogan R, Yenigun A, Veyseller B, Yildirim YS. Photographic objective alterations for laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis. J Voice 2017; 31(1): 78-85.
  2. Watts CR. Book review: The voice and voice therapy (Seventh Edition). J Med Speech Lang Pathol 2005; 13(4): 241-3.
  3. Rouev P, Chakarski I, Doskov D, Dimov G, Staykova E. Laryngopharyngeal symptoms and gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Voice 2005; 19(3): 476-80.
  4. Mouli VP, Ahuja V. Questionnaire based gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) assessment scales. Indian J Gastroenterol 2011; 30(3): 108-17.
  5. Oguz H, Tarhan E, Korkmaz M, Yilmaz U, Safak MA, Demirci M, et al. Acoustic analysis findings in objective laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. J Voice 2007; 21(2): 203-10.
  6. Weber B, Portnoy JE, Castellanos A, Hawkshaw MJ, Lurie D, Katz PO, et al. Efficacy of anti-reflux surgery on refractory laryngopharyngeal reflux disease in professional voice users: A pilot study. J Voice 2014; 28(4): 492-500.
  7. Behrman A, Sulica L, He T. Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions. Laryngoscope 2004; 114(10): 1693-700.
  8. Mojiri F, Qasemi M, Hoquqi N. Practices of voice therapy; Isfahan, Iran: Tolid Elm Publications; 2016. p. 25. [In Persian].
  9. Ramirez DAM, Jimenez VMV, Lopez XH, Ysunza PA. Acoustic Analysis of voice and electroglottography in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. J Voice 2017. [Epub ahead of print]
  10. Pribuisiene R, Uloza V, Kupcinskas L, Jonaitis L. Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients. J Voice 2006; 20(1): 128-36.
  11. Selby JC, Gilbert HR, Lerman JW. Perceptual and acoustic evaluation of individuals with laryngopharyngeal reflux pre- and post-treatment. J Voice 2003; 17(4): 557-70.
  12. Lopes LW, Cabral GF, Figueiredo de Almeida AA. Vocal tract discomfort symptoms in patients with different voice disorders. J Voice 2015; 29(3): 317-23.
  13. Rodrigues G, Zambon F, Mathieson L, Behlau M. Vocal tract discomfort in teachers: its relationship to self-reported voice disorders. J Voice 2013; 27(4): 473-80.
  14. Oh JH, Choi MG, Park JM, Lim CH, Cho YK, Lee IS, et al. The clinical characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with laryngeal symptoms who are referred to gastroenterology. Dis Esophagus 2013; 26(5): 465-9.
  15. Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101(8): 1900-20.
  16. Park JO, Shim MR, Hwang YS, Cho KJ, Joo YH, Cho JH, et al. Combination of voice therapy and antireflux therapy rapidly recovers voice-related symptoms in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012; 146(1): 92-7.
  17. Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice 2002; 16(2): 274-7.
  18. Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope; 111(8): 1313-7.
  19. Torabi H, Khoddami SM, Ansari NN, Dabirmoghaddam P. The Vocal Tract Discomfort Scale: Validity and reliability of the Persian Version in the Assessment of patients with muscle tension dysphonia. J Voice 2016; 30(6): 711-6.
  20. Eskenazi L, Childers DG, Hicks DM. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res 1990; 33(2): 298-306.
  21. Garrett R. Cepstral- and spectral-based acoustic measures of normal voices [MSc Thesis]. Milwaukee, WI: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; 2013.
  22. Kent RD, Vorperian HK, Duffy JR. Reliability of the Multi-Dimensional Voice Program for the analysis of voice samples of subjects with dysarthria. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 1999; 8(2): 129-36.
  23. Awan SN, Roy N, Jiang JJ. Nonlinear dynamic analysis of disordered voice: the relationship between the correlation dimension (D2) and pre-/post-treatment change in perceived dysphonia severity. J Voice 2010; 24(3): 285-93.
  24. Kondo Y, Ogasawara N, Sasaki M, Arimoto M, Yanamoto K, Nishimura K, et al. Edema of the interarytenoid mucosa seen on endoscopy is related to endoscopic-positive esophagitis (EE) and is an independent predictor of EE. Dig Endosc 2013; 25(6): 578-84.
  25. Pribuisiene R, Uloza V, Saferis V. Multidimensional voice analysis of reflux laryngitis patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005; 262(1): 35-40.
  26. Lechien JR, Saussez S, Harmegnies B, Finck C, Burns JA. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Voice Disorders: A Multifactorial Model of Etiology and Pathophysiology. J Voice 2017. [Epub ahead of print].
Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences
Volume 13, Issue 2 - Serial Number 2
June 2017
Pages 111-117
  • Receive Date: 14 June 2017
  • Revise Date: 26 April 2024
  • Accept Date: 22 May 2022