The Speech Therapy Methods for Global Aphasia: A Narrative Review

Document Type : Review Articles

Authors

1 PhD Candidate in Speech Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran AND Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

2 Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

10.22122/jrrs.v16i0.3565

Abstract

Introduction: Global aphasia due to extensive lesions in cortical, subcortical, and white matter of the left hemisphere is a severe acquired language disorder which disrupts all aspects of aural and written language. In the global aphasia, individual’s interaction and his social community is generally affected and he needs ongoing rehabilitation, especially speech therapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the common speech therapy methods for global aphasia and dissuss them based on exsiting evidence to introduce the most effective treatment.Materials and Methods: An electronic search in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Medline, SID, Google Scholar, Ovid, and Magiran databases for reviewing the common speech therapy methods was performed to obtain relevant articles published from 1980 to 2020. The keywords used included “Global aphasia”, “Treatment methods”, “Intervention”, “Speech therapy”, “Communication”, and “Therapy”.Results: Among 19 related articles, 9 speech therapy methods have been reviewed to improve communication, expression, and comperhensive language in global aphasia. The results showed that some of them were effective and some were ineffective.Conclusion: The review suggests that alternative nonverbal, augmentative, and complementary communication methods in the people with global aphasia will produce better results and techniques such as remnant books, the Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT), and SIPARI methods have been more effective than other methods.

Keywords

  1. Van Mourik M, Verschaeve M, Boon P, Paquier P, van Harskamp F. Cognition in global aphasia: Indicators for therapy. Aphasiology 1992; 6(5): 491-9.
  2. Conlon CP, McNeil MR. The efficacy of treatment for two globally aphasic adults using visual action therapy. In: Prescott TE, editor. Clinical aphasiology. vol. 19. Austin, TX: PRO-ED; 1991. p. 185-96,
  3. Naeser MA, Martin PI, Nicholas M, Baker EH, Seekins H, Helm-Estabrooks N, et al. Improved naming after TMS treatments in a chronic, global aphasia patient--case report. Neurocase 2005; 11(3): 182-93.
  4. Raymer AM, Gonzalez-Rothi LJ. The Oxford Handbook of aphasia and language disorders. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2018.
  5. Cubelli R, Trentini P, Montagna CG. Re-education of gestural communication in a case of chronic global aphasia and limb apraxia. Cogn Neuropsychol 1991; 8(5): 369-80.
  6. Johannsen-Horbach H, Cegla B, Mager U, Schempp B, Wallesch CW. Treatment of chronic global aphasia with a nonverbal communication system. Brain Lang 1985; 24(1): 74-82.
  7. Alexander MP, Loverso FL. A specific treatment for global aphasia. In: Lemme ML, editor. Clinical aphasiology. vol. 21. Austin, TX: PRO-ED; 1993. p. 277-90.
  8. Edelman G. Global aphasia: The case for treatment. Aphasiology 1987; 1(1): 75-9.
  9. Ho KM, Weiss SJ, Garrett KL, Lloyd LL. The effect of remnant and pictographic books on the communicative interaction of individuals with global aphasia. Augment Altern Commun 2005; 21(3): 218-32.
  10. Wapner W, Gardner H. A note on patterns of comprehension and recovery in global aphasia. J Speech Hear Res 1979; 22(4): 765-72.
  11. Fekar-Gharamaleki F, Dardani N, Khoddami SM, Jalayi S. The speech prosody tests: A narrative review. J Res Rehabil Sci 2019; 15(1): 58-64. [In Persian].
  12. Rose ML. The utility of arm and hand gestures in the treatment of aphasia. Adv Speech Lang Pathol 2006; 8(2): 92-109.
  13. Ward-Lonergan JM, Nicholas M. Drawing to communicate: A case report of an adult with global aphasia. Eur J Disord Commun 1995; 30(4): 475-91.
  14. Lebrun N. Drawing assessment protocol for adults with aphasia: A Rubric for Scoring [MA Thesis]. Wichita, KS; Wichita State University, College of Health Professions, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders; 2013.
  15. Hung PF, Ostergren J. A comparison of drawing and writing on facilitating word retrieval in individuals with aphasia. Aphasiology 2019; 33(12), 1462-81.
  16. Denes G, Perazzolo C, Piani A, Piccione F. Intensive versus regular speech therapy in global aphasia: A controlled study. Aphasiology 1996; 10(4): 385-94.
  17. Helm-Estabrooks N, Fitzpatrick PM, Barresi B. Visual action therapy for global aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 1982; 47(4): 385-9.
  18. Kurland J, Stanek EJ 3rd, Stokes P, Li M, Andrianopoulos M. intensive language action therapy in chronic aphasia: A randomized clinical trial examining guidance by constraint. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2016; 25(4S): S798-S812.
  19. Haro-Martinez AM, Lubrini G, Madero-Jarabo R, Diez-Tejedor E, Fuentes B. Melodic intonation therapy in post-stroke nonfluent aphasia: A randomized pilot trial. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33(1): 44-53.
  20. Sparks RW, Holland AL. Method: Melodic intonation therapy for aphasia. J Speech Hear Disord 1976; 41(3): 287-97.
  21. McCall D, Shelton JR, Weinrich M, Cox D. The utility of computerized visual communication for improving natural language in chronic global aphasia: Implications for approaches to treatment in global aphasia. Aphasiology 2000; 14(8): 795-826.
  22. Jungblut M, Suchanek M, Gerhard H. Long-term recovery from chronic global aphasia: A case report. Music Med 2009; 1(1): 61-9.
  23. Goodenough-Trepagnier C, Alexander MP, Baker EH. Development and testing of a computerized language intervention for acute global aphasia. Assist Technol 1989; 1(4): 81-90.
  24. Mirahadi S S, Khatoonabadi S A, Fekar Gharamaleki F. A review of divided attention dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Middle East J Rehabil Health Stud 2018; 5(3): e64738.
  25. O'Kelly J, Magee W, Street A, Fachner J, Drake, Cahen, et al. Music therapy advances in neuro-disability - innovations in research and practice: Summary Report and Reflections on a Two-Day International Conference. Voices: A World Forum for Music Therapy 2014; 14(1): 742.
  26. Mehri A, Ghaemi H, Kord N. Providing a picture verb naming test and determine its validity in Persian aphasia patients. J Mod Rehabil 2009; 3 (1-2): 6-10. [In Persian].
  27. Tahanzadeh B, Soleymani Z, Mehri A, Khodami S M, Jalaei S. Comparison of picture naming ability in fluent and non-fluent aphasics: An analysis of 4 cases. J Mod Rehabil 2013; 6(4): 1-7. [In Persian].
  28. Mehri A, Ghorbani A, Darzi A, Jalaie S, Ashayeri H. Comparing the production of complex sentences in Persian patients with post-stroke aphasia and non-damaged people with normal speaking. Iran J Neurol 2016; 15(1): 28-33.
  29. Behrmann M, Lieberthal T. Category-specific treatment of a lexical-semantic deficit: A single case study of global aphasia. Br J Disord Commun 1989; 24(3): 281-99.
  30. Mehri A, Jalaie S. A systematic review on methods of evaluate sentence production deficits in agrammatic aphasia patients: Validity and reliability issues. J Res Med Sci 2014; 19(9): 885-98.
  31. Hoover EL, Carney A. Integrating the iPad into an intensive, comprehensive aphasia program. Semin Speech Lang 2014; 35(1): 25-37.
  32. Simmons-Mackie N, Kagan A. Application of the ICF in aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 2007; 28(4): 244-53.
  33. Hinckley JJ, Douglas NF. Treatment fidelity: Its importance and reported frequency in aphasia treatment studies. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2013; 22(2): S279-S284.
  34. Hoffman P, Rogers TT, Ralph MA. Semantic diversity accounts for the "missing" word frequency effect in stroke aphasia: Insights using a novel method to quantify contextual variability in meaning. J Cogn Neurosci 2011; 23(9): 2432-46.
  35. Conroy P, Sotiropoulou DC, Humphreys GF, Halai AD, Lambon Ralph MA. Time for a quick word? The striking benefits of training speed and accuracy of word retrieval in post-stroke aphasia. Brain 2018; 141(6): 1815-27.