Prediction of Functional Movement Screen Scores in Men Firefighters by the Performance in Deep Squat Test

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 Department of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, School of Sports Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Sports Injuries and Corrective Exercises, School of Sports Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

10.22122/jrrs.v13i6.3081

Abstract

Introduction: Functional movement screen (FMS), a seven-test battery, has been introduced to identify individuals at risk of injury. It is sometimes impossible to use the whole FMS battery, due to the limitations of time or resources. In this study, we studied how much it was valid to use deep squat (DS) test as an alternative for FMS.Materials and Methods: Target population included all 524 firefighters operating in Isfahan City, Iran. They accomplished DS and FMS tests. The cut-point of DS was determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and its predictive accuracy was determined via logistic regression analysis (LRA).Results: ROC curve revealed that based on the best DS cut-point, the value of sensitivity (true positive) was 0.92, and the value of "1 - specificity" (false positive) was 0.55. LRA showed that, compared to holders of 2 and 3 DS scores, holders of 0 and 1 scores were nine times more likely to obtain score less than 14 in FMS.Conclusion: Findings of this study supports the alteration of FMS by DS in case of limitation of time and resources, especially when examining big populations. Due to false positive rate of 0.55 for subjects scoring 14 or less in FMS, it is still necessary to execute the FMS for them for accurate verification. Such an approach will save about 30 to 40 percent of time and resources.

Keywords

  1. Kim SH, Kwon OY, Park KN, Jeon IC, Weon JH. Lower extremity strength and the range of motion in relation to squat depth. J Hum Kinet 2015; 45: 59-69.
  2. Cook G, Burton L, Kiesel K, Rose G, Bryant MF. Movement: Functional movement systems: Screening, assessment, corrective strategies. Aptos, CA: On Target Publications; 2010. P. 51-205.
  3. Gray GW. Lower extremity functional Profile. Adrian, MI: Wynn Marketing; 1995. p. 23-122.
  4. Voight ML, Hoogenboom BJ, Prentice WE. Musculoskeletal Interventions: Techniques for Therapeutic Exercise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2006. p. 20-188, 206-92.
  5. Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom BJ, Voight M. Functional movement screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014; 9(3): 396-409.
  6. Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a preseason functional movement screen? N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2007; 2(3): 147-58.
  7. O'Connor FG, Deuster PA, Davis J, Pappas CG, Knapik JJ. Functional movement screening: Predicting injuries in officer candidates. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43(12): 2224-30.
  8. Clifton DR, Grooms DR, Onate JA. Overhead deep squat performance predicts functional movement screen score. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2015; 10(5): 622-7.
  9. Wolf SL, Barnhart HX, Kutner NG, McNeely E, Coogler C, Xu T. Reducing frailty and falls in older persons: An investigation of Tai Chi and computerized balance training. Atlanta FICSIT Group. Frailty and Injuries: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Techniques. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996; 44(5): 489-97.
  10. Parsons J, Mathieson S, Jull A, Parsons M. Does vibration training reduce the fall risk profile of frail older people admitted to a rehabilitation facility? A randomised controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38(11): 1082-8.
  11. Lee P. The economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders. Qual Life Res 1994; 3(Suppl 1): S85-S91.
  12. Gribble PA, Hertel J, Plisky P. Using the Star Excursion Balance Test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: A literature and systematic review. J Athl Train 2012; 47(3): 339-57.
  13. Coyte PC, Asche CV, Croxford R, Chan B. The economic cost of musculoskeletal disorders in Canada. Arthritis Care Res 1998; 11(5): 315-25.
  14. Buckle P. Ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders: overview. Occup Med (Lond) 2005; 55(3): 164-7.
  15. Azari G, DavudianTalab A, Mazlomi Mahmudabad E, Mofidi A, DavudianTalab A. Complaint of pain in the upper limbs and its relationship with job stress in office workers. Toloo-e-behdasht 2013; 12(3): 149-60. [In Persian].
  16. Song HS, Woo SS, So WY, Kim KJ, Lee J, Kim JY. Effects of 16-week functional movement screen training program on strength and flexibility of elite high school baseball players. J Exerc Rehabil 2014; 10(2): 124-30.
  17. Ghasempoor K, Rahnama N, Bagherian-Dehkordi S. Functional movement screening of students of Shahrekord technical institute, Iran, for sports injuries prevention. J Res Rehabil Sci 2015; 11(4): 263-72. [In Persian].
  18. Page P, Frank CC, Lardner R. Assessment and treatment of muscle imbalance: the janda approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2010.
  19. Gribble PA, Brigle J, Pietrosimone BG, Pfile KR, Webster KA. Intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27(4): 978-81.
  20. Shojaedin SS, Hadadnezhad M. Relationship between functional movement screen (FMS) score and the history of injury and identify the predictive value of the FMS. J Res Rehabil Sci 2013; 9(3): 459-69. [In Persian].
  21. Peate WF, Bates G, Lunda K, Francis S, Bellamy K. Core strength: A new model for injury prediction and prevention. J Occup Med Toxicol 2007; 2: 3.
  22. Swart E, Redler L, Fabricant PD, Mandelbaum BR, Ahmad CS, Wang YC. Prevention and screening programs for anterior cruciate ligament injuries in young athletes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96(9): 705-11.
  23. Butler RJ, Plisky PJ, Southers C, Scoma C, Kiesel KB. Biomechanical analysis of the different classifications of the Functional Movement Screen deep squat test. Sports Biomech 2010; 9(4): 270-9.
  24. Clark MA, Lucett S, Medicine NAS, Corn RJ. NASM Essentials of personal fitness training. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2008. p.99, 200-30.
  25. Stiffler MR, Pennuto AP, Smith MD, Olson ME, Bell DR. Range of motion, postural alignment, and LESS score differences of those with and without excessive medial knee displacement. Clin J Sport Med 2015; 25(1): 61-6.
  26. Bell DR, Vesci BJ, DiStefano LJ, Guskiewicz KM, Hirth CJ, Hirth CJ. Muscle activity and flexibility in individuals with medial knee displacement during the overhead squat. Athl Train Sports Health Care 2012; 4(3): 117-25.
  27. Kibler WB, Wilkes T, Sciascia A. Mechanics and pathomechanics in the overhead athlete. Clin Sports Med 2013; 32(4): 637-51.
  28. Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, Zheng N, Lander JE, Barrentine SW, Andrews JR, et al. Effects of technique variations on knee biomechanics during the squat and leg press. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33(9): 1552-66.
  29. Lehr ME, Plisky PJ, Butler RJ, Fink ML, Kiesel KB, Underwood FB. Field-expedient screening and injury risk algorithm categories as predictors of noncontact lower extremity injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2013; 23(4): e225-e232.
  • Receive Date: 29 June 2018
  • Revise Date: 19 April 2024
  • Accept Date: 22 May 2022