Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences

Effectiveness of Intervention Focused on Pragmatics

Document Type : Original Articles

Authors

1 MSc Student, Student Research Committee (Treata), Department of Speech and Language Pathology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3 Instructor, Department of Speech Therapy, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan AND PhD Student, Department of Speech Therapy, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran

10.22122/jrrs.v12i4.2720

Abstract

Introduction: Conversational skills are the most important pragmatic skills. Among conversational skills, conversational repair and clarification request have important roles in preventing communication failures. Social communication disorder (SCD) involves important defects in pragmatic language skills. Children with SCD constantly encounter communication failures due to defect in pragmatic and communication skills. Thus, presenting interventions focused on these skills is important. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of intervention focused on conversational repair and clarification request in children with SCD.Materials and Methods: This single subject, multiple probe study was conducted on 3 children with social communication disorder. The subjects were selected from among children of 5 to 7 years of age referring to a speech therapy clinic. The children were assessed 3 sessions before and 3 sessions after therapy. They were taught a variety of conversational repair and clarification request strategies during 12 therapy sessions, each lasting 40 minutes. Data were analyzed based on the visual analysis of charts drawn for each child and using improvement rate difference (IRD).Results: Visual analysis of charts and IRD showed that the children improved in conversational repair and clarification request skills (IRD > 91% and IRD > 83%, respectively). After the intervention, subjects could use different conversational repair and clarification request strategies.Conclusion: The efficacy of the intervention focused on conversational repair and clarification request skills in children with SCD was acceptable.

Keywords

  1. Sahin S, Yalcinkaya F, Muluk NB, Bulbul SF, Cakir I. Abilities of pragmatic language usage of the children with language delay after the completion of normal language development training. Int Adv Otol 2009; 5(3): 327-33.
  2. Girolametto LE. Improving the social-conversational skills of developmentally delayed children: an intervention study. J Speech Hear Disord 1988; 53(2): 156-67.
  3. O'Neill DK. The language use inventory for young children: a parent-report measure of pragmatic language development for 18- to 47-month-old children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2007; 50(1): 214-28.
  4. Klusek J, Martin GE, Losh M. A comparison of pragmatic language in boys with autism and fragile X syndrome. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014; 57(5): 1692-707.
  5. Brinton B, Fujiki M, Loeb DF, Winkler E. Development of conversational repair strategies in response to requests for clarification. J Speech Hear Res 1986; 29(1): 75-81.
  6. Ciocci SR, Baran J. The use of conversational repair strategies by children who are deaf. Am Ann Deaf 1998; 143(3): 235-45.
  7. Salehi S, Shirazi TS, Darui A, Dolatshahi B. The effect of the pragmatic therapy plan on hearing-impaired children. Audiol 2013; 22(3): 112-23. [In Persian].
  8. Samuelsson C, Lyxell B. Clarification requests in everyday interaction involving children with cochlear implants. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol 2014; 39(3): 130-8.
  9. Geller E. An investigation of communication breakdowns and repairs in verbal autistic children. The British Journal of Development Disabilities 1998; 44(87): 71-85.
  10. Gibson J, Adams C, Lockton E, Green J. Social communication disorder outside autism? A diagnostic classification approach to delineating pragmatic language impairment, high functioning autism and specific language impairment. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54(11): 1186-97.
  11. Donahue M, Pearl R, Bryan T. Learning disabled children's conversational competence: responses to inadequate messages. Applied Psycholinguistics 1980; 1(4): 387-403.
  12. Staikova E, Gomes H, Tartter V, McCabe A, Halperin JM. Pragmatic deficits and social impairment in children with ADHD. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2013; 54(12): 1275-83.
  13. Selas M, Helland WA. Pragmatic language impairment in children with Noonan syndrome. Clin Linguist Phon 2016; 30(11): 899-910.
  14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. p. 47-9.
  15. Lockton E, Adams C, Collins A. Do children with social communication disorder have explicit knowledge of pragmatic rules they break? A comparison of conversational pragmatic ability and metapragmatic awareness. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2016; 51(5): 508-17.
  16. Collins A, Lockton E, Adams C. Metapragmatic explicitation ability in children with typical language development: development and validation of a novel clinical assessment. J Commun Disord 2014; 52: 31-43.
  17. Adams C, Lloyd J, Aldred C, Baxendale J. Exploring the effects of communication intervention for developmental pragmatic language impairments: a signal-generation study. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2006; 41(1): 41-65.
  18. Norbury CF. Practitioner review: Social (pragmatic) communication disorder conceptualization, evidence and clinical implications. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2014; 55(3): 204-16.
  19. Gallagher TM. Revision behaviors in the speech of normal children developing language. J Speech Hear Res 1977; 20(2): 303-18.
  20. Nakhshab M, Modarresi Y, Agharasuli Z, Keyhani M. Conversational repair strategies in normal children. J Res Rehabil Sci 2010; 6(1): 45-51. [In Persian].
  21. Ghayoumi Anaraki Z, Ghasisin L, Mahmoodi Bakhtiari B, Fallah A, Salehi F, Parishan E. Conversational repair strategies in 3 and 5 year old normal Persian-speaking children in Ahwaz, Iran. Audiol 2013; 22(1): 25-31. [In Persian].
  22. Merrison S, Merrison AJ. Repair in speech and language therapy interaction: Investigating pragmatic language impairment of children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 2005; 21(2): 191-211.
  23. Adams C, Lloyd J. The effects of speech and language therapy intervention on children with pragmatic language impairments in mainstream school. British Journal of Special Education 2007; 34(4): 226-33.
  24. Adams C, Lockton E, Freed J, Gaile J, Earl G, McBean K, et al. The Social Communication Intervention Project: a randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of speech and language therapy for school-age children who have pragmatic and social communication problems with or without autism spectrum disorder. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2012; 47(3): 233-44.
  25. Gerber S, Brice A, Capone N, Fujiki M, Timler G. Language use in social interactions of school-age children with language impairments: an evidence-based systematic review of treatment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2012; 43(2): 235-49.
  26. Trosborg A. Pragmatics across languages and cultures. New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter; 2010. p. 47-167.
  27. Kazemi Y, Afsharianzadeh E, Mirzaei B, Baghbani M, Gheleyempour L, Najarzade M, et al. The Children's Communication Checklist (CCC): A study on Iranian Children. Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences 2007; 2(3): 1-5.
  28. Paul R. Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Assessment and Intervention. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2012. p. 65-97.
  29. Hedge MN, Maul CA. Language disorder in children: An evidence-based approach to assessment and treatment. Boston, MA: Pearson; 2005. p. 172-255.
  30. Paul R. Interventions to improve communication in autism. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 2008; 17(4): 835-x.
  31. Gillam SL, Gillam RB. Making evidence-based decisions about child language intervention in schools. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2006; 37(4): 304-15.
  32. Prosser L. Social communication difficulties resource pack. London, UK: Routledge; 2011. p. 17-48.
  33. Gast DL, Ledford JR. Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis; 2009. p. 277-328.
  34. Byiers BJ, Reichle J, Symons FJ. Single-subject experimental design for evidence-based practice. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2012; 21(4): 397-414.
  35. Fey ME. Language intervention with young children. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1986. p. 62-269.
  36. Parker RI, Vannest KJ, Brown L. The improvement rate difference for single case research. Exceptional Children 2009; 75(2): 135-50.
  37. Brinton B, Fujiki M, Sonnenberg EA. Responses to requests for clarification by linguistically normal and language-impaired children in conversation. J Speech Hear Disord 1988; 53(4): 383-91.
  38. Garvey C. Requests and responses in children's speech. J Child Lang 1975; 2(1): 41-63.
Journal of Research in Rehabilitation Sciences
Volume 12, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
September 2016
Pages 200-209
  • Receive Date: 07 January 2017
  • Revise Date: 27 April 2024
  • Accept Date: 22 May 2022